Thursday, October 08, 2015

Brutally Beautiful

The Barbican Estate is a residential complex built during the 1960's and 1970's in Central London, in an area that was heavily damaged by bombings during World War 2. It is an example of a development with Brutalist Architecture and despite being a relatively new development in its entirety it is Grade II listed hence protected.


Although largely comprising of residential units, the complex also has the Barbican Centre (an arts, drama, and business centre) amongst others, making it a hub for artistic and cultural events. Not to mention having several cafes, restaurants, and quirky shops.




I won't go on too much about the facts and figures of the Barbican Estate, rather just letting it's own website and Wikipedia do all of that. Although we do go round London often enough as 'tourists' (both our careers are London based) I haven't been to this part of London before so with a nudge to Gaz we paid the complex a visit one fine Saturday.





My motivation to see it? Curiosity to check out its Brutalist Architecture as well as it's supposed to be integrated green spaces and bodies of watering including a koi pond. 

Well I'm not too sure about the koi pond, I didn't see it but perhaps we just missed it but the green spaces are there as well as the large bodies of water...


















They even have a conservatory but alas only open on Sundays and Bank Holidays. From outside it looked interesting enough to warrant a need for a return visit when it is open.





So is the Barbican Estate beautiful? Ahh yes I suppose. I say that with an objective tone. Subjectively, I'm not too sure but it is certainly a very interesting place to spend time in.



Mark :-)

21 comments :

  1. Looking at your photos, that was my reaction too. It's interesting and certainly impressive in scale but not somewhere I'd feel compelled to go back to time and again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a very trendy part of London, with its art scene and all but it still gets mixed reactions up to now architectural beauty wise.

      Delete
  2. Looks very much worth a visit, although I'm not sure I'd want to live there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It looks congested but was surprisingly very tranquil when we visited, the residential sections at least.

      Delete
  3. We visited the Barbican on the occasion of London Open gardens this year. Some of the plantings made clever use of native plants. One might even say unnatural growing of native plants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed. The place is surprisingly green despite being so built up and elevated.

      Delete
  4. I suspect there are two sides. I've heard that people who actually live there love it - or at least it's rare for a flat to become available. However, I've never been there when there wasn't a vicious wind sweeping round the corners, a result of the architecture, I think, and there never seems to be a direct route anywhere, which is infuriating. It's not an environment that is particularly pleasant to be around, I feel, though possibly much more acceptable to be inside it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So desirable are the properties there, but then again it is Central London...

      Delete
  5. I've always intended to visit- but never had a chance. Thanks for sharing the photos which give a good impression of what it's like. It's so different from anything I know.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Somewhere I've actually been! It certainly looks better than it did on my visit. I don't remember any plants at all, just the wind whipping around the buildings, and whip it did.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I like that island garden with the sunken seating areas. I have been meaning to see the conservatory for a while; hopefully the next time I am in London I have a free Sunday.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Reminds me of some of the buildings on my university campus. So dreary and depressing. They didn't have the water or green spaces, though. It would have been a vast improvement.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I had never heard of Brutalist architecture. It sounds rather severe and grim. I was happy to see all the lovely green spaces and water features!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ooh, a little trip back down memory lane for me, there! I was last in the Barbican a long time ago on a beautiful sunny summer's day, with good friends, and absolutely loved it. I'd been to see the Issey Miyake exhibition (which was wonderful) and then stayed on for a wander round. I've always thought it would be a wonderful place to live so it's been lovely to revisit via your photos -and I really should go there again for real!

    ReplyDelete
  11. They did a lot of good work to mitigate the effect of packing people in like sardines.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm with Loree, it's an interesting place to visit but living there would not be my cup of tea. Looking forward to seeing the conservatory.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I'm fascinated by Brutalist architecture. I can't say I love it, but it has a severe charm all its own. The plantings definitely add interest. If I had plans to visit London, I'd add the Barbican Estate to my list of places to see.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Call me weird, but I really like the Barbican, it is so brutal it somehow works, and all those green spaces work so well against the hard shapes. I've never explored as much as you guys did, there are some really big green spaces!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I enjoy the sculptural articulation of Brutalist architecture as seen from a distance, but I also was taken by how much of their plazas (like so many modernist complexes) seemed devoid of people. I was happy to see your overall shots, which proved that impression wrong. It would be very fun to visit, but I also think Gerhard nailed it when he said "severe charm".

    ReplyDelete
  16. Got to say I've always been rather fond of the Barbican and used to visit often when I lived in London.

    ReplyDelete
  17. We have a few examples of Brutalist architecture in Washington, DC. One of the most notable was a church (!), just a few blocks from the White House, whose congregation wanted to tear it down for years. The building was interesting, but not exactly beautiful. They finally jumped through all the historic preservation hoops and now it's gone. Ironically, what went up in its place was a bland, uninteresting, and uninspired office building like so many others in this city.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for taking the time to reply to our post, we love reading comments and hearing your views.

Due to the increased level of spam, please note comments on older posts are moderated and only published after approval. All new comments are read and any spam is deleted.